INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RELATED SERVICES

Contact Us

Legal Win stands as a leading authority in insolvency and bankruptcy law, renowned for expertise, industry leadership, and unwavering client recognition. Our team provides end-to-end legal services covering insolvency, restructuring, liquidation, and distressed asset transactions under the IBC, 2016. 

We have achieved the highest number of wins and landmark judgments before the NCLT and NCLAT, making us the most recognised firm at these tribunals. Our proven track record of success and consistent client endorsements underscore our reputation for excellence.

Legal Win represents a diverse spectrum of clients, including creditors, debtors, resolution professionals, and investors, in both contentious and non-contentious matters. Our strategic, client-focused approach ensures personalised attention and maximised value recovery in every case.

Our expertise extends to High Courts and the Supreme Court of India, where we continue to deliver superior outcomes. Clients trust us for our integrity, commercial acumen, and innovative legal strategies to navigate the most complex insolvency challenges.

With unmatched leadership, sector-wide recognition, and a commitment to practical, commercially viable solutions, Legal Win remains the partner of choice for insolvency and bankruptcy matters across India.

Typical Shareholder Disputes Handled by Legal Win

Minority Shareholder Oppression

I. Exclusion from management
II. Denial of voting rights
III. Illegal dilution of shareholding
IV. Preferential allotments benefiting promoters
V. Non-disclosure of financial information
VI. Diversion of business opportunities

Mismanagement Cases

I. Misappropriation of company funds
II. Related party transactions causing loss to the company
III. Diversion of assets and revenues
IV. Violation of Articles of Association
V. Breach of fiduciary duties by directors
VI. Fraudulent corporate governance practices

Promoter And Founder Disputes

I. Deadlock between co-founders
II. Disputes over control of the board
III. Enforcement of shareholder agreements
IV. Breach of tag-along and drag-along rights
V. Exit and valuation disputes

Family Business Disputes

I. Succession disputes
II. Control over closely held companies
III. Illegal transfer of shares
IV. Removal of directors belonging to one family faction
V. Diversion of assets by rival promoter groups

Investor Protection Matters

I. Private equity and venture capital disputes
II. Breach of investment agreements
III. Non-compliance with reserved matters
IV. Violation of affirmative voting rights
V. Forced exits and unfair valuation mechanisms

Special Matters

Allotment of shares and related disputes arising from

I. exit rights,
II. tag-along rights,
III. drag-along rights,
IV. reserved matters, and transfer restrictions

Our Delivery Model

PHASE 1

IP AUDIT & RISK ASSESSMENT

a. Identification of protectable assets. b. Portfolio review. c. Infringement risk analysis. d. Competitor intelligence and brand clearance.

PHASE 2

REGISTRATION & PROTECTION

a. Trademark filings. b. Patent filings. c. Copyright registrations. d. Design registrations. e. International protection strategies.

PHASE 3

MONITORING & ENFORCEMENT

a. Marketplace monitoring. b. Counterfeit detection. c. Online infringement tracking. d. Domain name surveillance.

PHASE 4

LITIGATION & RECOVERY

a. Cease-and-desist notices. b. Injunction actions. c. Civil and criminal complaints. d. Damages and compensation claims. e. Settlement and mediation support.

PHASE 5

COMMERCIALIZATION

a. Licensing structures. b. Royalty arrangements. c. Technology transfer. d. Franchise and brand expansion e. IP valuation and transaction support.

Why Legal Win?

Deep Corporate Litigation Experience

Our team has extensive experience in handling shareholder disputes involving:

a. Private companies
b. Listed companies
c. Family-owned enterprises
d. Start-ups and technology companies
e. Infrastructure companies
f. Manufacturing businesses
g. Real estate and construction companies

Integrated Legal and Financial Strategy

Oppression and mismanagement proceedings frequently involve:

a. Forensic audits
b. Financial fraud investigations
c. Share valuation disputes
d. Corporate restructuring
e. Regulatory violations

Legal Win combines legal, forensic, accounting, and commercial expertise to develop comprehensive litigation strategies.

Expertise in Emergency Reliefs

We regularly seek and obtain:

a. Interim injunctions
b. Stay of board resolutions
c. Stay of Extraordinary General Meetings
d. Restraint on share transfers
e. Freezing of bank accounts
f. Appointment of independent administrators

Testimonials

As a minority shareholder facing serious oppression and mismanagement, I engaged Legal Win Consulting LLP to protect my rights and the company's interests. The dispute involved the diversion of company funds, breaches of fiduciary duties by directors, corporate governance failures, and the exclusion of minority shareholders from management. Legal Win demonstrated exceptional expertise in proceedings under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013. Their team conducted a thorough forensic review of financial records and successfully established acts of oppression, mismanagement, and misuse of company assets by the directors. Through their strategic representation before the NCLT, Legal Win secured orders for the recovery and restoration of monies siphoned from the company, enforced accountability for breaches of directors' duties under Section 166, and obtained directions regulating the company's future affairs. Most importantly, they successfully secured orders restraining the directors from engaging in competing business activities and from further interfering with the company's operations. Their deep domain knowledge, commercial understanding, and advocacy skills were instrumental in achieving a decisive victory. I strongly recommend Legal Win Consulting LLP for complex shareholder disputes, corporate governance issues, and oppression and mismanagement proceedings.

As an overseas shareholder and strategic investor in an Indian company, we faced a significant challenge when the company proceeded with a rights issue without obtaining our prior approval, despite the affirmative voting rights and reserved matter protections granted to us under the Shareholders' Agreement and Articles of Association. The company further sought to implement the transaction through board resolutions, AGM approvals, and consequential ROC filings, resulting in a potential dilution of our shareholding and investment rights. Legal Win Consulting LLP immediately identified multiple legal and governance violations involving Sections 62, 117, 179 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 relating to rights issues, shareholder approvals, filing of resolutions, and corporate governance compliance. Their team conducted a meticulous review of the Shareholders' Agreement, Articles of Association, board and AGM proceedings, statutory records, and ROC filings to establish the illegality of the transaction. Through strategic legal intervention, Legal Win successfully enforced our affirmative rights, challenged the validity of the rights issue, and secured the recall of the transaction and corrective corporate actions. Their efforts prevented unlawful dilution of our shareholding and protected the contractual and governance rights negotiated as part of our investment. Legal Win's deep expertise in shareholder disputes, foreign investor protection, corporate governance, AGM and board process challenges, and NCLT proceedings was instrumental in achieving a successful outcome. We highly recommend Legal Win Consulting LLP to overseas investors, private equity funds, and strategic shareholders seeking protection of their shareholder rights in India.

As an overseas minority shareholder, we faced a grave situation where the company's affairs were being conducted in a manner that was oppressive to minority shareholders and prejudicial to the interests of the company. The existing Board of Directors had abused their powers, disregarded shareholder rights, breached corporate governance norms, and siphoned substantial funds from the company through unauthorized transactions. Legal Win Consulting LLP undertook a comprehensive investigation of the company's affairs, including financial records, statutory filings, board proceedings, related-party transactions, and governance practices. Their deep expertise in shareholder disputes, oppression and mismanagement proceedings under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, enabled them to build a compelling case before the NCLT. Through meticulous preparation and exceptional advocacy, Legal Win successfully demonstrated systemic abuse of shareholder rights, breaches of fiduciary duties under Section 166, diversion of company funds, and serious acts of mismanagement. The NCLT accepted these findings and passed far-reaching orders directing the exit of the existing Board of Directors, recovery and restoration of siphoned funds to the company, and implementation of a professional management structure to safeguard the company's future operations and stakeholder interests. The outcome not only protected our investment but also restored transparency, accountability, and sound corporate governance within the company. Legal Win's strategic approach, forensic capabilities, and mastery of complex shareholder litigation were instrumental in securing this landmark result. We highly recommend Legal Win Consulting LLP to minority shareholders, foreign investors, and stakeholders facing oppression, mismanagement, corporate governance failures, and boardroom disputes.

As a technology partner and minority shareholder, we faced systematic oppression by the Board of Directors, including unauthorised related-party transactions, diversion of company funds, and exclusion from key management decisions. Legal Win Consulting LLP initiated proceedings under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging oppression, mismanagement, and breach of directors' fiduciary duties under Section 166. Through a detailed forensic and legal investigation, Legal Win established violations of Sections 184 and 188 relating to interested directors and related-party transactions, resulting in substantial losses to the company. Their effective representation before the NCLT led to the cancellation of illegal related-party transactions, directions for recovery of monies siphoned off by the directors, and regulatory measures to restore corporate governance and accountability. Legal Win's expertise in shareholder disputes, corporate governance, and NCLT litigation was instrumental in protecting our investment and securing justice.